CNN scrambles to cover themselves during the 4D-chess match they can’t seem to understand:  http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/04/politics/kfile-reddit-user-trump-tweet/index.html

“His ugly behavior”!? You are the only one with an ugly behavior here, CNN! You are threatening to dox a kid for making a joke gif about a huge media company (which, btw, means you’re blackmailing him for using his freedom of speech) – a world wide giant felt intimidated by a kid on Reddit and had to shut him down? Wtf is up with that! This is absolutely insanity!

You disgust me, CNN. You are a bunch of hateful, worthless, lying assholes, and I hope you will go bankrupt as soon as possible. All CNN journalists should be without a job, effective immediately. Your days of relevance are over.

To quote Thomas Jefferson:

“I deplore the putrid state into which our newspapers have passed and the malignity, the vulgarity, and mendacious spirit of those who write for them… These ordure’s are rapidly depraving the public taste and lessening its relish for sound food. As vehicles of information and a curb on our functionaries, they have rendered themselves useless by forfeiting all title to belief.”

And by newspapers, he most certainly meant companies like yours, CNN.

For the history you didn’t learn in school, check out Liberty Classroom:

The post CNN’s Ugly Behavior appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

Here is the the short Pravda version of how the Fed works:

Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Murray N. Rothbard on how it was formed and what it does:

A speech by Murray N. Rothbard. Presented at the Mises Institute’s 1984 “Seminar on Money and Government,” in Houston, Texas.

Source:  https://youtu.be/Ta7q1amDAN4

For the history you didn’t learn in school, check out Liberty Classroom:

The post On The Federal Reserve | CNN vs. Murray Rothbard appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

I know many people believe that “one should join politics to do ‘greater good’ for the society” but they fail to consciously understand that politics is a profession designed to degrade, dictate and debauch the liberties of all individuals except for the establishment.

Therefore, politics is a medium to organically achieve the disastrous conclusions.

It’s the power that attracts the miscreants toward politics, otherwise, why wouldn’t you become an entrepreneur, social volunteer, educator, anarchist or an agorist to serve the economic needs, anthropological desires and empathetic expectations of the people?

I am sure that you would not join the Taliban group to “change” the theme of Islamic terrorism “from within”. Similarly, what’s so magical about ‘joining politics to change politics from within’?

In this case, the only good thing about Taliban terrorists is that:

1) they do not fund the media,

2) camouflage people’s opinion,

3) fake electionery promises,

4) lobby with cronyists and

5) deliver unaccountable GDP results.

Whereas, politicians enjoy the monopoly on terrorizing the system.

Amazon Gold Box – Deals of the Day – Today’s Deals

They say, “It is not ok if you are uninterested in politics because every function of our lives is determined by the activities of the politics”. I think this is untrue and baseless.

Every activity is, in fact, determined by freedom, reason and human action.

It’s the politics which turn things upside-down through legislations, regulatory captures, and legal robbery.

Read: Why democracy choose bad policies?

Watch: Why politicians don’t cut spending?

Anyway, good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws or constitution. To become a good person, you do not need a ruler. You need voluntary or apolitical rules. And, as long as we have the supply of politics, the world will never know peace.

Either by left way or right way, the virtual aim of the politics is to dominate, conscript, expropriate and inspect the life, liberty, and property of individuals. Debating “who is the lesser evil” is idiotic, incoherent and imbecilic. It does not matter who is in power because politics is anyway the art of strengthening the master-slave relationship. It is also the principle or policy of concentrating extensive economic, political, and related controls in the ‘democratic’ government at the cost of individual liberty (refer democide).

Conclusion: Imagine that you detach from legitimizing the whole saga on the voting day and become a person of humane conscience.

For the history you didn’t learn in school, check out Liberty Classroom:

The post You Should Not Join Politics. This is why. appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

Decide for yourself.

Support our site by clicking through our Amazon link to make your purchases.

For the history you didn’t learn in school, check out Liberty Classroom:

The post Megyn Kelly Interview of Alex Jones Looks Damning appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

What matters to them is their own “political ego” and nothing else.

But, it isn’t my business to decide the best political opinion, statement or scientist because ‘politics is inherently a waste of time, energy, mind and wealth’.

Read the following reasons to know why, and figure them out at your discretion without feeling guilty, low and manipulated:

1.  Debating politics would not change anything except your personality and social impression, which would ultimately make you look stupid in the end.

For example: You have a political opinion about A. Your friend (frenemy) has a political opinion about B. You justify the debate as a “social process of enlightenment” but what would you or your opponent do with the opinion, when the views have simply backfired, and changed nothing, during the process?

If you believe that your political opinion will “simply and suddenly” change the omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent nature of the government then you’re absolutely wrong.

Why should a “characterless gang of the armed leaders” give a fuck about your opinion when you’re not part of their monopoly game?

Ask yourself because the burden of proof is not on me.  

2.  Sharing political opinions is not an act of information-sharing, enlightenment and cognitive emancipation because you’re simply speaking what your government wants you to.

You may believe that you have “freedom of speech” in this case but you’re not doing anything new, simply because your political opinion is manipulative, subjective and asocial.

For example: You believe that government should X and not Y. Your opponent believes that the government should undo X and do Z instead. What you fail to realize  is that the government is going to do what it wants without giving a fuck about your political enlightenment because the economics of the government is dependent upon expanding its power and minimising your freedom at the expense of everyone else.

Your political opinion may lean from left to right or vice versa, but your opinion is simply static within the political spectrum of the system. If you believe that your opinion should make sense then try to pose an apolitical statement and see how your frenemies and government reacts to it.

3.  Well, do you remember the time the slaves banded together to beg their masters for freedom, and they succeeded? Or, the time the Jews pleaded with the Pharaoh to let them free, and they were successful? Such events never happened and would never happen, and it’s easy to understand that such scenarios are silly, right?

Sadly, many of the loudest “political voices” believe that doing the same thing i.e. “asking our chivalrous master to voluntarily cede the parasitical power, is the only way of achieving equality and liberation”. They believe that if you just vote (harder) for the “lesser evil”, all of our problems will be solved! Little do they realize that voting for a lesser evil is still choosing an evil. You don’t need a political opinion to quantify the size of the evil.

You simply need a psychologist to help you understand that there’s only one evil, and that is the government. Lysander Spooner, once said:

“A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.”

Conclusion:

Debating politics may not be an important tool for those who are newly introduced to the ideas of freedom. Neither it will ever be the solution to attaining freedom. Politics is antithetical to freedom since you are conceding that you require a master. Debating politics adds more fuel to the fire.

Freedom does not come from permission.

Stop wasting your time in debating and trying to lengthen the master’s leash around your neck. Freedom will be won when you take control of your life. Freedom comes from recognizing that you are a free, beautiful, and independent human being. Don’t let anyone ever tell you otherwise through “political discussions”.

If #PoliticalDebatesMatter then do follow these steps:

The post 3 Reasons Why Discussing Politics is Waste of Time appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

Misunderstanding anarchism is also an auxiliary activity of the mainstream media, public schools, bureaucrats, politicians, and the ignorant populace.

Their imagination isn’t only limited to the belief that ‘government is a magical institution’ but it also extended to the practice that everyone else should also survive within the limits of their perspectives.  If you attempt to reason or discourse with them then they will ensure that you’re ashamed and defamed.

Thus, the burden of proof is not on the anarchists to prove “why freedom is vital” but on the pro-slavery advocates to prove “why people should be forced to live in a system of organised chaos (government)”. 

Worse, some who call themselves “anarchists” don’t even know the meaning of the term. These people fall, in general, into three classes:

1) advocating that state should be abolished and then replacing the society with collectivism spirit, wherein “anarchists” should not be allowed to reap fruits from their own labor,

2) advocating that state should be abolished and then replacing the ‘welfare policies of Stalin’ with the ‘welfare policies of Mao’, and

3) advocating that the state should be abolished and then replacing the society with ‘Trump’.

Therefore, it is also necessary to save anarchism from such “anarchists”.

Many ignoramuses continue to believe that “anarchism is terrorism” because they’re taught to believe that anarchists blow up the buildings, bridges and ‘roads’. This is the height of today’s modern education, in fact.

Anarchists are not the ‘violent creatures’ who believe that people have a compulsory obligation to follow incoherent and illusionary ideologies like republicanism, communism or parliamentary democracy. Instead, anarchists are the ‘voluntary creatures’ who intend to tranquilly denounce the general belief i..e “there should be rulers to police, discipline and indoctrinate the populace”.

Please note that anarchism is not an anti-freedom philosophy that calls for the initiation of violence on peaceful people who simply disagree or dissent, otherwise, why do you think the government officials had such a hard time defining the word “terrorism”?

The answer is that every time they defined the word ‘terrorism’ they admitted to this stunning fact that the government’s action utilises the use of terror on peaceful people. A government can only survive via the initiation of violence of individual’s property rights.

Without the use of terrorism, the government would cease to exist, and a propertarian society would ensue wherein peaceful people are free to do as they wish as long as they don’t infringe on others. In social relations between people, certain voluntary social norms will have to be accepted, namely, the obligation to fulfill a freely accepted agreement.

In this case, it is advisable to ratiocinate [form judgments by a process of logic; reason] that:  anarchism is not anti-rules, but anti-rulers.

To sum up, anarchism is self-government (or its equivalent, self-administration). Self-government is the best form of government, which people rarely talk about because they have more faith in a ‘few strangers’ ruling them and others at the expense of everyone else.

Self-government starts with self-discipline. If you cannot discipline yourself then you have no right to misunderstand anarchism. You can move to North Korea to get policed morally and bodily before bashing the theory of anarchism for the sake of criticism.

The post Misunderstanding Anarchism appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

In lieu of the “fake news” hysteria invented by the left “liberals” after their excruciating defeat in the recent 2016 elections, let us take a close look at some actual fake news that has been circulating in social media lately. The circulating myth that I’m referring to is a short video about Sweden generating the false narrative of a government mandate, passed to enforce a compulsory transition from an eight hour work day to a six hour work day. It is difficult to decide what the most upsetting part of the video is, the fact that it’s a flat out lie, or the indisputable ignorance in regards to the laws of economics as well as the economic history in Sweden, from people displaying support for such legislation.

It’s not a huge surprise that misinformation like this gains traction in social media outlets. After all, it does give aid and comfort, even though it’s a false sense of comfort, to socialists who champion a failed ideology, which should have been thrown in the dustbin of history. The minions of Karl Marx are desperate and they will latch on to anything they can these days, and they certainly won’t let the truth or empirical evidence stand in their way.

It is very popular, to say the least, for Bernie Sanders supporters and other left wing liberals to point to Sweden as a successful case of democratic socialism, but the rationale behind this conclusion is astonishingly trivial. These people will look at a snapshot in time, namely the present economic and social conditions in Sweden, and they will not spend an ounce of energy to research the historical actions by the Swedish people, leading up to the current situation.

From 1850 to 1950 Sweden had a liberalization of economies unheard of in most of the world during that time. Under this century of quasi laissez-faire capitalism, Sweden, a very poor country, saw the value of capital stock skyrocket, and the real income of families increased by more than a multiplicative of ten. Furthermore, Sweden had a public sector smaller than the one in the United States, which allowed for capital investment to take place, and privatization of the means of production. The awareness of the growing value of the capital stock, among the Swedish citizens, lowered their time preference for consumption, and increased their willingness to await delayed gratification. Sure enough, Sweden systematically became a wealthy nation, due to free markets, very little government spending, and very low taxes. We should also not forget that Sweden did not participate in either WW I or WW II, and that also certainly helped Sweden to become one of the five wealthiest countries in the world.

From the 1950 and onwards, the Swedish government started to plunder the nation’s capital stock, and we witnessed the beginning of economic decline in Sweden as a result of socialist regulatory reform via a vast expansion of the welfare state. In fact, between 1950 and 2005, Sweden did not manage to add one singe net private sector job. By looting the wealth generated under a century of economic prosperity, Sweden has been able to live in comfort, not because of socialism, but rather in spite of socialism.

I wish that the same people, who pass around these memes or videos, would look at what Sweden has done to become a wealthy nation, and not what an already wealthy Sweden is doing to destroy its capital stock.

For further debunking of Scandanvian Socialism, please see:

www.tomwoods.com/717

And:

https://www.libertyclassroom.com/sweden/

The post Fake News About Sweden Gives Aid and Comfort to Socialists appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

So dumb.

The bad news:  All your internet-connected devices can be used to spy on you

The good news:  It’s not as bad as we thought

What are they waiting for, some woman to come up on your screen and tell you to start doing your morning exercises like in 1984?

#AlwaysLookOnTheBrightSideOfLife

The post If You Can’t Fake It, Downplay It appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

Just take a look at this exchange between Tucker Carlson and Bill Nye:

Now check out how this is being spun in the media:

Bill Nye is no scientist.

Science isn’t “settled”.

Government cannot “solve” global warming/cooling, climate change.

In fact, government is the biggest polluter and aboslute worst steward of the environment in the history of the World:

Check out Murray Rothbard on Conservation and Property Rights:

The post Fake News Controls the Narrative appeared first on Actual Anarchy.

Life is all about balance!

What happens when you come to expect it? Or worse — when you’re forced to always be in that position?  Being unwillingly taken advantage of isn’t something anyone wants.

When it comes to the relationship between the media and the US government, the government isn’t even the big spoon. The big spoon is “access”.

The problem is we have a government that is extremely secretive giving access cards only to media outlets willing to carry water for them.

This turns news media outlets into more of a prostitute service than an actual news organization. Which is actually an insult to prostitutes, and for that I apologize.

I would imagine there are quite a few prostitutes that have better ethics than today’s media. These media prostitutes have been whoring out for government access for so long now they’ve forgotten what it means to be objective.

That isn’t entirely their fault.

Government is always the root of the evil. If the news outlets are objective then they risk losing access. Which means it benefits mainstream media outlets to carry water for the government if they want to ask a question next press conference.

Media would still play an important role in society without a government. Mainstream news media without government means not having to worry about access. It means not having someone capable of controlling the narrative simply because they hold the entry pass. Media outlets should be subject to the market place, but since government exists to give this privileged access then government can control the media market place.

If only Fox, CNN, and MSNBC get prostitute passes then the market is forced to use those outlets for information coming from government. Good news is the wave has been rolling, and quickly reaching its breaking point.

Mainstream news outlets are being exposed more and more often as simply being puppet mouthpieces for the US government.

Currently, James O’Keefe is performing a Wikileaks type dump to expose CNN.

Alternative news websites with quality journalists are having their voices heard, and helping destroy the controlled narrative. The internet has helped break down that wall at flash fire speeds. With all the mounting pressure, I hope the media finally tells the US government to fuck off. Mainstream media is slowly being backed into a corner, and it’s becoming clear that the only way to escape is to become a respectable news organization. The people no longer believe the lies.

The questions are – how long will the media keep this up before finally caving? And how far are they willing to push this before caving?

Captain A

The post The Media is the Little Spoon appeared first on Actual Anarchy.