Did you know that Black Lives Matter wants to “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family”? The group aims to support “each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children.” Seems eerily similar to the manifestos of the early “gay rights” movement, as noted in part 1.
What about the Socialist 2019 conference, where “Transgenderism, gender nonconformity, and abolishing traditional family structures were huge issues” because the nuclear family was said to have “reinforced capitalism … [and] propped up oppression”? Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?
All leftist movements, from BLM to LGBT, are merely useful tools for moving society “forward.” Each distracts with its varied brand of “social justice,” “aggrieved-minority rights,” and “equality,” but they all share the same end goal: demolish the family, demolish God.
“If there is no absolute by which to judge society, society becomes absolute.”
— Dr. Francis A. Schaeffer, theologian and philosopher
Pedophilia and pederasty are the linchpins for this post-modern paradigm. Is there anything more effective at obliterating traditional human relations than normalizing “intergenerational sex” between “minor-attracted persons” and children? Achieving this monumental win for the new man would finally usher in the “new age of progress” that the left has always been seeking.
This new normal would be an illusion of nothingness and everything, liberty and tyranny, radical collectivism and rabid individualism, spiritual bondage and fleshly freedom, all played out together in one chaotic mess. The acronym “LGBT+” tells the story, with each letter representing subsequent steps taken in this long march to nihilism. And we’re allowing it to happen.
After all, how can one deviance be acceptable but another not? Why draw a line at child abuse a la pedophilia when society condones hormonal “gender transition” for 7-year-olds? Why have the state lock up a dirty old man with a penchant for young boys when some state governments and state universities subsidize sex-reassignment surgery for children? It’s incoherent.
Just ask Tom O’Carroll, the convicted British pedophile. The longtime activist for man-boy sex wrote in his blog that adolescent Desmond the Amazing is “hot!” and that “being a drag queen … says, loud and proud, ‘I am a sexy kid, with sexy feelings. It’s totally cool for grown-ups to get turned on by me.’”
What else would you expect “When a pretty young boy tells the world he is gay and dances sensuously in front of grown men, wearing vampish dresses and makeup; when ‘she’ strips off items of clothing or goes on stage scantily clad right from the off; when dollar bills are accepted as ‘tips’ from an audience apparently wild with excitement”? Yep. What a sad testament to society’s downfall that it takes a child rapist to state the obvious.
Dabney’s words are overlaid across a photo of drag-kid Desmond, who had a penchant for dancing for money at gay bars back in 2018. O’Carroll sees this as “far more than just a celebration of gender diversity or an innocent display of precocious performance talent.” And he’s absolutely correct.
Our depraved and dying culture is defined by the commodification of sex, so why not commodify a child? And if outmoded is the belief that “moral law governs sexual acts,” as Father Josiah Trenham bemoans, then who in society has a virtue-ethics leg to stand on in railing against adult-child sex?
“Freedom is indivisible. The liberation of children, women, boy-lovers, and homosexuals in general, can occur only as complementary facets of the same dream.”
— David Thorstad, NAMBLA founder
O’Carroll actually attempts to use virtue ethics to bolster his degenerate and dangerous sexual wonts in an essay published by a peer-reviewed academic journal. UC Irvine’s Justin Lee summarily demolishes O’Carroll’s philosophical leaps, but points out his overall logical consistency.
In short, if you seek a freedom that is void of God, then anything goes. If you are the creator of your own reality, then this is what you get: sexual liberation of the most debased order.
Lee concludes his article by quoting Justice Anthony Kennedy in the Supreme Court’s decision upholding abortion. “At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”
Isn’t that really all O’Carroll and his fellow pedos are doing: just pushing the boundaries, challenging the norms, and prescribing their own truth? It’s what’s known in modern parlance as “progress.”
When attendees at Socialist 2019 espouse that “the modern transgender movement plays a critical part in achieving true ‘reproductive justice,” well, this seems to make no rational sense. After all, trans endocrine experimentation and “sex-reassignment” surgery decreases offspring.
But to these cuckoo comrades, it’s about procreating the next generation of nihilistic automatons through artificial means, like interpersonal grooming, technocratic science, corporate marketing, and mass-media indoctrination. Plus, if citizens do have a “right” to kill children – I mean, it is “precedent,” right, Justice Kennedy? – they may as well have a “right” to have sex with children.
If BLM is a “queer‐affirming network” intent on “freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise),” why not free yourself and affirm pedo thinking? Get woke, and just loosen your intolerant grip, bigot.
If the anti-white apparatchiks really “desire freedom and justice … regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, [or] gender expression,” they’d have to accept “boylovers,” or else they’d be age-supremacists and tools of the hierarchy they say they hate, right? They’d be just as bad those “white supremacists” and that “anti-blackness” systemic racism they’re always railing against.
Even well-known free-market economists like Jeffrey Tucker and Deirdre McCloskey echo sentiments that sound more like Antifa than Adam Smith. Apparently, it’s becoming quite vogue to say that traditional families are dangerous collectives with fascistic tendencies.
“A modern society in its authoritarian version expands the family to the nation, the folkhem,” McCloskey wrote. “Our families are little socialist economies, with Mom as central planner.” In order to expand freedom, democracy must flourish and hierarchy must be smashed, so let’s break those ancient chains and emancipate everyone, children included.
The scholarly McCloskey seems not to understand that the family (in concert with faith) is the only competing institution to the state power “she” claims to deplore. Or maybe HE knows darn well what HE is advocating for, since Deirdre used to be Donald.
“Jesus” was one of the “greatest enemies of peace, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness.”
— William A. Percy, III, historian and pederast activist
What’s important is that what all these anti-family subversives share is the belief that it’s all about civil rights for the individual. Or at least that’s what they say. And if that’s the case, well, pedo is the ultimate minority.
Presciently, Linda Harvey, founder of Mission America, stated back in 2013 that “equal rights for pedophiles will become more common as LGBT groups continue to assert themselves.” She continued, “It’s all part of a plan to introduce sex to children at younger and younger ages; to convince them that normal friendship is actually sexual attraction.”
This is precisely the ambition of the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality. Its members contend that “basic sexual rights” are defined as “the right to engage in sexual acts or activities of any kind whatsoever, providing they do not involve nonconsensual acts, violence, constraint, coercion or fraud.”
Other rights include being “free of persecution, condemnation, discrimination, or societal intervention in private sexual behavior” and that no individual should be “disadvantaged because of their age.” Judgment is hate, don’t ya know?
Of course, there is nothing but fraud when you’re talking about sex between an adult and a child. The pedos get “consent” through either outright or the velvet glove of coercion.
This is O’Carroll’s tact in downplaying “intentionality.” I mean, the hifalutin bioethicists say that even dogs “are not shy about expressing sexual interest in humans” and can have “requisite feelings in a reciprocal relationship of interpersonal (in all but name) character, [so] why would a child be incapable of doing so?” “Eureka!” exclaim the perverts.
Lee further exposes the deranged postulations of the deviants: “We eat animals without their consent, so why not screw them? Children, especially young children, consent to little of what we subject them to, so why shouldn’t we let O’Carroll bugger babies?” Screw childhood innocence. Literally.
O’Carroll might be a sodomizing child rapist, but what makes his views any more unpalatable than, say, Allen Ginsberg, who won the National Book Award for Poetry, was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters, won a gold medal from the National Arts Club, and was a finalist for the Pulitzer?
The Beat poet’s work “Howl” has been translated into 20+ languages and is still studied in literature classes across the country, despite the fact that Ginsberg was an outspoken pederast. He once flippantly remarked, “I’m a member of NAMBLA [the North American Man-Boy Love Association] because I love boys too – everybody does, who has a little humanity.”
Even though queer theorist and anti-porn-activist Andrea Dworkin looked up to Ginsberg as her intellectual mentor, his unapologetic lust for kids was a bridge too far even for the superbly radical Jewish feminist. “The right wants to put me in jail,” Ginsberg once opined, to which Dworkin replied, “Yes, they’re very sentimental; I’d kill you.”
In 1978, NAMBLA was co-founded by Tom Reeves, who was a member of Boston’s Fag Rag Collective (just like Michael Bronski, the Harvard professor whom I cited in part 1). In addition to his working for the abolition of age of consent laws and sex-offender registries, Reeves was an ordained Methodist minister, a retired professor, and a former speech writer for Senator George McGovern.
“When I go into a bank or a church, I feel dirty; but when I am having sex, I feel clean.”
— Tom Reeves
David Thorstad, another NAMBLA founding member and pedo zealot, wrote in a posthumous Reeves’ tribute, “I have often fantasized about pissing out candles in a Catholic church or shitting on the floor of a bank. And I share Tom’s sense of edgy and radical uplift and soaring purity while making love with a boy.”
William A. Percy, III, a former professor at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, commented that Reeves was the spiritual ancestor of Thomas Paine, as the two were both great patriots and visionaries for liberty. Percy describes himself as a “queer, sodomite, and [an] aficionado of ‘public sex’ and bathhouses.”
Over at BoyWiki.org, you can see just how persistent are the perverts. They say they’re fighting to preserve the “history, culture, and heritage” of “boylovers.” That it’s a matter of promoting acumen, individual rights, and free speech, and tapping into the Ancient Greek tradition of pederasty. It’s all about erastes (older men) and eromenos (adolescent boys) getting it on. It’s their ancestral duty as men of the West, you see.
Gone is the repulsive Modern Boylover Magazine.
Enter in the new man’s magazine, Ethos.
The boy-raping groomers think that appropriating the language of antiquity for their publication’s name will give their evil predilections and behavior an air of legitimacy. They’re simply enlightened and honorable men who are wildly misunderstood.
They think the tagline “Amor et intellectus” (meaning “Love and intellect” in Latin) will somehow elevate and destigmatize these sodomizers of children. If only all the plebs understood how high-IQ we are! They’re fighting for “abstract conviction!” Dworkin knew it was a huge hustle. And so do I.
Percy decries pederast “persecution,” asserting that they’re living under the “neo-Jim Crow of homophobic drug and sex-offender laws.” He adds that because of his “sexual escapades,” his life is “always a moment away from destruction like Jews under Hitler or so-called pedophiles today.” Thorstad too likened being a pederast in the U.S. to “being a Jew in Nazi Germany.”
O’Carroll may be an admitted “boylover,” but he gets the libertine evolution. “Identity politics is vicious,” he wrote in the comments of his Desmond blog. “It pits oppressed minorities against each other when everyone should be calling for true justice i.e. equal rights for all.”
If we treat one pathology as a normal path to happiness, love, and human freedom, why not another? If you’re going to advocate for the “equity and inclusion” of one “marginalized minority group,” you must support it all. Let’s undo racism and pederast-phobia. Pedo Lives Matter, right?
It’s time to stand for God and against “the boastful devices of infidel democracy,” as Dabney described an increasingly godless America. Let’s destroy the macabre monster of progress once and for all, or we cannot complain of the heinous consequences.
Source: Dissident Mama – Pedophilia IS “progress,” part 2
