That Feeling When Jerry Springer Calls You Out On Your “Dignity”

By Steven Clyde

If you grew up in the 90’s, and were lucky enough to have access to TV without your parents around, you may have watched Jerry Springer in all its glory.

From girls in the audience flashing their breasts in exchange for bead necklaces, to fights breaking out on stage after a “ding ding” sounds off to start them, to Jerry himself throwing out his opinions in the matters, it made some of us feel like our lives were that much more “normal”.

But what of Jerry to call out ANYONE, even Trump, for a lack of dignity? Ben Shapiro, the sometimes good friend of freedom, had a funny response:

Pot, meet Kettle.

Just to put that into perspective:


Just a snippet from Springer’s illustrious past:

Springer was elected to the Cincinnati city council in 1971. He resigned in 1974 after admitting to hiring a prostitute. The episode was uncovered when a police raid on a Fort Wright, Kentucky massage parlor found a check Springer had written pinned to a wall in their office with “for services rendered” written in the memo.

Not that this should be a crime.

You Should Not Join Politics. This is why.

If you believe that you possess a good conscience with devilish motives, then politics is a vocation meant for you because it gives you the monopoly on accessing unaccountable power for performing sadistic activities at the expense of your exchequers.

I know many people believe that “one should join politics to do ‘greater good’ for the society” but they fail to consciously understand that politics is a profession designed to degrade, dictate and debauch the liberties of all individuals except for the establishment.

Therefore, politics is a medium to organically achieve the disastrous conclusions.

It’s the power that attracts the miscreants toward politics, otherwise, why wouldn’t you become an entrepreneur, social volunteer, educator, anarchist or an agorist to serve the economic needs, anthropological desires and empathetic expectations of the people?

I am sure that you would not join the Taliban group to “change” the theme of Islamic terrorism “from within”. Similarly, what’s so magical about ‘joining politics to change politics from within’?

In this case, the only good thing about Taliban terrorists is that:

1) they do not fund the media,

2) camouflage people’s opinion,

3) fake electionery promises,

4) lobby with cronyists and

5) deliver unaccountable GDP results.

Whereas, politicians enjoy the monopoly on terrorizing the system. Continue reading “You Should Not Join Politics. This is why.”

James Comey Revelations

By Pat Heyman

Okay, my wife made me watch the Comey hearings and commentary, so here are my thoughts.

1. Comey is a pompous holier-than-thou ass.

2. He has a reputation as non-partisan straight shooter, but everything he has done since last summer is politically calculated.  Comey didn’t seem to have a problem referring to the investigation of Clinton as a “matter” which is the political game of semantics to skirt law and official processes.

3. It is extremely clear that his “exoneration” of Clinton

a) overstepped the boundaries of his job,

b) was a complete fabrication and twisting of the law (Scott Horton had a great interview about Clinton and how intent is not required for violations of classified material), and

c) politically motivated.

4. Despite #3, he cutely says that it’s not his place to know if Trump obstructed justice.

5. He admitted to leaking his own memos for political purposes, specifically to provoke the appointment of a special prosecutor.

6. He is emblematic of everything that is wrong with the FBI, which seems to be more interested in swaying politics and fostering domestic terrorists than fighting crime. Continue reading “James Comey Revelations”

A Political Guide To Destroying Your Economy

WARNING:  Before you implement the pieces of advice, it is necessary for you to have a nuke or else it is not easy to declare yourself as a legal thug who is going to constitutionally take care of everything at the expense of everyone else except yourself.

Otherwise, you would have a difficult time in organising the slaves and call yourself “the government”.

To destroy your nation’s economy, you need to abhor freedom of others. If you lack this quality, you are not “mentally fit” to envy and expropriate others. All your actions can be justified by a piece of paper called “constitution”. There’s nothing to worry about, except anarchists.

Second thing, you should never learn economics. What matters is sociology because it helps us to “screech autistically” and attain the status of victimhood, followed by a biased understanding of the history subject.

Professional Victim

By the way, if you come across any “critical thinker” or “learned person” then it is your moral duty to shun his/her opinion without using facts, but sentiments.

Anyway, the above premises are the fundamental and foundational qualities to embrace the civility of a good politician. Only Ron Paul can be a bad politician because he does not support this guide/blog. I condemn him for that. Continue reading “A Political Guide To Destroying Your Economy”

​The Curse of the Billionaire Politician

By David Hynes

Recently, it has come to my attention that Mark Zuckerberg advocated for a universal income in a recent commencement speech. I have mostly been avoiding commenting on or thinking about it because it as tragic as it was predictable.

It comes as no surprise to me that Mark Zuckerberg has finally crossed the threshold into politics. After all, DJT proved that America is OK electing a big name billionaire businessman, and Bernie proved that the welfare state has an irresistible ring to it. Why not Zuckerberg? (And yes, please read that in the Zoidberg voice!) Simultaneously, the clear interest Facebook has had in social tinkering- its meaningless banning of people offering firearms for sale, its intentional dividing of people into echo chamber audiences, its vow to put a stop to “fake news” while the so called “real news” sources are all laughably corrupt and slanted- tells us that Facebook is not just about making a great advertising platform and social meeting place anymore.

I’m a huge fan of the free market. It’s no secret that I think it is better than the government at everything, and more moral. So it’s a sort of irony that the people who are most successful in the market have a tendency to promote welfarism and things of that nature. What is the point, then of listening to what any less successful people have to say, right? Zuck is better than you at your own game that you claim to love. Doesn’t that mean his ideas are better? Doesn’t that mean that, not only does he have the market figured out, but he has good governance figured out too?  Continue reading “​The Curse of the Billionaire Politician”

3 Reasons Why Discussing Politics is Waste of Time

Different people possess different opinions, definitions and comprehensions about politics. Many individuals continue to [vociferously] express and discourse their stagnant views and loud perspectives about politics, respectively. They “feel good” about what they say, no matter how incoherent their statements are. They wouldn’t mind shunning others’ “political opinion” without realising that the inherent quality of any political debate is cyclically poor.

What matters to them is their own “political ego” and nothing else.

But, it isn’t my business to decide the best political opinion, statement or scientist because ‘politics is inherently a waste of time, energy, mind and wealth’.

Read the following reasons to know why, and figure them out at your discretion without feeling guilty, low and manipulated: Continue reading “3 Reasons Why Discussing Politics is Waste of Time”

Misunderstanding Anarchism

It is fashionable to misunderstand the theory, character, principles and applications of anarchism, in the age of alt-internet. Due to this, anarchism is considered as a ‘ludicrous illusion’ whereas government (the idea so mandatory that violence can civilise people without their consent) is considered to be the best gift of reality.

Misunderstanding anarchism is also an auxiliary activity of the mainstream media, public schools, bureaucrats, politicians, and the ignorant populace.

Their imagination isn’t only limited to the belief that ‘government is a magical institution’ but it also extended to the practice that everyone else should also survive within the limits of their perspectives.  If you attempt to reason or discourse with them then they will ensure that you’re ashamed and defamed.

Thus, the burden of proof is not on the anarchists to prove “why freedom is vital” but on the pro-slavery advocates to prove “why people should be forced to live in a system of organised chaos (government)”. 

Worse, some who call themselves “anarchists” don’t even know the meaning of the term. These people fall, in general, into three classes:

1) advocating that state should be abolished and then replacing the society with collectivism spirit, wherein “anarchists” should not be allowed to reap fruits from their own labor,

2) advocating that state should be abolished and then replacing the ‘welfare policies of Stalin’ with the ‘welfare policies of Mao’, and

3) advocating that the state should be abolished and then replacing the society with ‘Trump’.

Therefore, it is also necessary to save anarchism from such “anarchists”. Continue reading “Misunderstanding Anarchism”

Trump has been Neo-Conned, has the Trump Train Officially Derailed?

A fear many Trump supporters had before Trump was even elected was the so-called swamp actually being drained should he win the presidency. And although he made some progress in this endeavor by placing a few key people in influential positions such as Jeff Sessions as the Attorney General and Steve Bannon as his chief strategist, much of this progress has been thwarted or undone in recent days.

From Sessions recusing himself from inquiries into any matters related to investigations into Trump and Russia connections, a seemingly never ending conspiracy theory concocted by the left and Never Trumpers like John McCain, to Steve Bannon being removed from his position as chief strategist, the swamp seems to be filling up rather than being drained. And all this comes on the heels of Trump’s military action against Syria on April 6th.

The claim, once again, was made that Syria’s president Bashar Assad attached his own people with chemical weapons.

This same exact claim was made back in 2013!

But what is interesting back then was that it was never proven that Assad was the one who launched the attacks; a point to which even the New York Times omitted when they compiled a list of Assad’s alleged atrocities. Many people, including Carla del Ponte, a member of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, said the 2013 gas attack in Syria appeared to have been launched by “Syrian rebels” and not the Assad government.

Additionally, The Daily Mail reported on leaked emails from a defense contractor getting approval from Washington D.C. to have U.S. controlled rebel groups launch the attacks and blame it on Assad who the U.S. has been eyeing for years to force out in a regime change. Fast-forward to 2017 and we’re witnessing deja vu. If at first you don’t succeed, try again?

Continue reading “Trump has been Neo-Conned, has the Trump Train Officially Derailed?”

The Trump Moment is Over

Trump was never supposed to be a pro-war president. He had talked about how the middle eastern wars, were foolish and mistakes.  Now he has plans to not just stop  Bashar al-Assad, but to end his rule.   There is a lot at stake here. The airfield that was attacked was run by Russia. It is doubtful that Putin will be too happy about this. What’s more, is that the Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, is already talking about taking steps to remove Assad.

What  happened

This was all brought on by the chemical weapons strike carried out by the Syrian military.  There are some who wonder if Assad, actually had called for the strike.  There is a lot of reason to doubt that Assad and Putin had tried to pull this off. They were winning. Hard to win when you commit and an obvious war crime to anger the entire western word, who already hate you for your friends. (Russia, Iran) That reason alone makes the whole thing incredible. Assad had no motive to try to anger the US, yet here we are.

What is more, the last time Assad was accused of using chemical weapons, he was later proven to be innocent and the weapons used had belonged to the rebels. The New York Times is convinced that Assad has carried out this attack and others, claiming this is part of his strategy.  This ignores a fact such a plan is suicidal. It is all well and good if these are simply rebels, but that is not the case. Many of the rebels are backed by the US and have been since the early days of the war in 2011. Knowing the biggest power in the world, has their eyes on you conflict, makes any attempt at chemical or other banned weapons, incredibly dangerous.  If Assad didn’t use chemical weapons, back in 2013, why would he now?
The scary reality

We committed an act of war against a country, with significant military backing from a nuclear power, with little evidence.  There is no way this goes anywhere profitable for the USA or our allies. We are becoming the Air Force for our most bitter enemies. All this does, is advance the cause of ISIS. If we ever want to see peace return we need to pull out of the region entirely and let the native people work this out.

It could be too late 

Continue reading “The Trump Moment is Over”

Media Doesn’t Care About Pedophiles

By Rex Gazer

The last 2 weeks has been rough for Donald Trump and his supporters. First there was the political assassination of the Michael Flynn. Now his enemies were looking to add Milo Yiannopoulos to the political body count.

Milo, a gay, Jewish, conservative provocateur, who has given the left fits, (And been the inspiration for a massive riot)  was on a YouTube podcast a little over a year ago, in this live-stream he made some comments about the age of consent, and about his own life and sexuality.  Recently the video resurfaced, but cut to make Milo look as though he was supporting pedophilia. I am not going to get into why that is false, but will suggest everyone see the whole segment and then decide for yourself.

The Left and Right both have pounced on this and both have been trashing Milo. Continue reading “Media Doesn’t Care About Pedophiles”