Tolkien was an Anarchist

By Carl Killough


A man who lived through WWI and understood the power of the state by his wartime experience: J. R. R. Tolkien. His works show a great spectrum of political power structures which span from pure and free to evil and controlling.

Tolkien was an anarchist.

Think about the journey from the Shire to Mordor:

The hobbits live in the freedom of the Shire. They have no formal government and live in anarchy. As they travel east, they witness varying levels of increasing control and corruption.

Rivendell is the perfect platonic republic under the care of the ‘wise rulers’. But it is rigid and constrained by Elrond. Its success depends upon the longevity and nearly incorruptible nature of the elves.

Yet Rivendell is a step down in freedom from the Shire. In spite of the strong will and high character of the elves, it is still Frodo, a hobbit from the completely free Shire who is selected to carry the ring. Even an elf would succumb to its power. If the Ring is state power, then only the most free can hope to survive it’s influence.

Orthanc and Saruman himself show the danger of trusting in a wise leader. When danger threatened from Mordor, Saruman took the easy path of bending to evil. His power was flipped from serving good to spreading corruption and death. When it came down to a choice, he chose power for himself over freedom, and even life, for others.

Rohan is a loose feudal monarchy held together by Theoden. Tolkien shows us the danger of a wise ruler being corrupted by evil through Saruman’s agent, Gríma Wormtongue. The nation nearly falls to the orc invasion because of the corrupting power of Saruman, Sauron and the Ring.

Gondor is a crumbling empire that has finally succumb to its own size and lack of wise leadership. The reigns of power still remain to be abused by the insane Denethor, Steward of Gondor. He becomes so desperate and trapped in his own madness that he refuses to call for aid. When Denethor commits suicide in despair, he almost drags down the people of Gondor with him.

Mordor should be obvious: Full power. Absolute control and absolute evil are equated through Sauron and the One Ring. The orcs march rank and file. There is no light except that of the evil eye upon Barad-dûr, watching to make sure every orc does his duty. It is the ultimate authoritarian state.

The Ring itself is power and control. We are constantly told through the books that it is unable to be wielded without succumbing to its corruption and thus spreading evil even in the attempt to do good. The power of the state is represented through the ring.

Gandalf is an embodiment of good but also an agent of power. Since Gandalf is good, Tolkien shows restraint in the way Gandalf uses his powers. Gandalf only uses his power when forced to do so. But he is stretched thin and cannot put out all the fires caused by the corruption of Sauron’s One Ring. The source of power can only be destroyed by the smallest and most free, a hobbit from the Shire.

Through Gandalf and the Ring Tolkien tells us that power cannot be fought by power. Power itself (the ring) must be destroyed, not through using force, but by letting it go. (Dropping it, releasing it, into the fires of Mt. Doom.) The right to rule must be let go, by not accepting it, and never using it, and thus destroying it.

At the end of the novels, Tolkien takes us back to the Shire. The corrupt Saruman has sought revenge upon the hobbits by bringing in Ruffians (immigrants of low character). This Ruffian network enslaves the hobbits, forcing even the peace loving inhabitants of the shire to take up arms in defense. Tolkien’s final message is that when you remove corruption from power, expect those who were corrupted to fight back and take revenge. Even a peaceful society must be ready to defend itself.

And what about Gollum? Smeagol represents us all: The common individual tempted by power. Wrapped in the ring’s blanket of comfort we find reason to ignore the slow release of our individuality. We choose the pleasures the state gives, while ignoring its cost. Rather than examine the effects of the ring upon himself, Smeagol gives up, sacrifices his identity, and becomes nameless. Absorbed fully by the temptation of the ring, of state power, Smeagol becomes a slave. In the end, Gollum chooses self-destruction with the ring rather than give up his ‘precious,’ but not before he fights tooth and nail to protect it.


Here is the Read Rothbard Podcast episode on the Lord of the Rings:

Episode 13 – The Ring of Power Must Be Destroyed (1:15:42)

 

There are those among us that will fight to protect their state provided comforts. Some are even willing to use violence to do it. They will throw their bodies into the fires of Mt. Doom to prevent the destruction of their own ‘precious’. Addicted to state provided resources, laws enforcing their version of morality, and propaganda, they will feel trapped.

Previously being dedicated to projecting their morality through state power and law they will have a huge struggle with cognitive dissonance. Those who love freedom and liberty will point out how the Smeagols of the world have been serving evil by consenting to state rule. This forces the mind of the Smeagol Statist to choose between two realities: Either they were wrong in the past and thus have to deal with the guilt of spreading corruption, or they will reject the message of the freedom lover to prevent the obvious discomfort of re-examining their world view.

Those unable to overcome their confirmation bias will defend their old view. This is much easier to do than to change world views. They will see those who want to reduce and remove the power of the state as an attack on their lifestyle. They will see you, freedom lover, as a threat, and thus evil. Eventually their Gollum will overcome their Smeagol and they will fight to save the state.

Be ready for their ire.


For the history you didn’t learn in school, check out Liberty Classroom:

Get the equivalent of a Ph.D. in libertarian thought and free-market economics online for just 24 cents a day….

Leave a Reply